#17 Everyone's An Expert Nowadays, Because Of This One Simple Trick!
Sources
1. Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A., & Legout, A. (2016). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Science, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896377.2901462
2. Ward, A. F., Zheng, J. (F), & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2023). I share, therefore I know? Sharing online content ‐ even without reading it ‐ inflates subjective knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1321
3. Gaviria, C., Corredor, J., & Zuluaga-Rendón, Z. (2017). “If it matters, I can explain it”: Social desirability of knowledge increases the illusion of explanatory depth. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2073–2078). Cognitive Science Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318708217_If_It_Matters_I_Can_Explain_It_Social_Desirability_of_Knowledge_Increases_the_Illusion_of_Explanatory_Depth
4. Gaviria, C., & Corredor, J. (2021). Illusion of explanatory depth and social desirability of historical knowledge. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 801–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09267-7
5. Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032
6. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1